Navigating The Hidden Trio of Leadership Transitions – Grief, Gratitude & Growth

Written by Suzanne

0

October 29, 2025

When we think about leadership transitions—new roles, reorganizations, retirements, or even layoffs—our first instinct is often to focus on strategy and structure. Who’s leading what? What’s the plan? How do we communicate the change?

But underneath every org chart update sits something deeply human: grief.

We rarely name it that way, yet every transition involves a loss. The loss of a familiar rhythm. Of a trusted colleague. Of a way of working that, even if imperfect, was known.

Why I’m Writing About This Again

In the Leadership, Transitions & Grief series we’re hosting this fall, one theme keeps echoing louder than ever before: the hardest part isn’t the change itself—it’s what we have to let go of along the way.

And lately, there’s been a lot to let go of.

Across industries, we’re seeing waves of restructuring, layoffs, retirements, and re-entries into hybrid workplaces that still don’t feel settled. Entire leadership teams are changing hands. The healthcare and public sectors are stretched to breaking points. Even those who’ve “landed” in new roles are quietly asking themselves, “Why doesn’t this feel like a win?”

There’s a collective weariness in the air—what some describe as anticipatory grief. Leaders know more changes are coming. They’re trying to hold their people, deliver results, and stay human in systems that keep shifting under their feet.

In our sessions, I’ve heard voices crack as people describe losing the colleagues who made the work meaningful. Others share the guilt of being the ones who stayed after the cuts. Some are mourning the way their organization used to feel—a culture that once had rhythm, humour, and belonging, now replaced with silence and exhaustion.

And it’s not just “out there.” It’s here, in the room, in the Zoom squares. You can feel it in the pause before someone answers, in the shaky laughter after a difficult story.

That’s why I keep coming back to this topic.
Because grief isn’t a side effect of change—it is the change.
And unless we name it, honour it, and move through it with intention, it festers as disengagement, distrust, or burnout.

So I write about it again because we’re living it—every one of us.
Because naming it gives us a language for healing.
Because gratitude and growth don’t come after grief—they grow through it.

Endings: Letting Go of What Was

William Bridges reminds us that change is situational, but transition is psychological. Every new beginning starts with an ending.

In his model, the first zone of transition is Endings—the space where we must release old identities, roles, or ways of being. It’s the part most leaders rush past, because it’s messy. People are emotional. Productivity dips. The energy feels uncertain.

But grief lives here.
It’s not weakness—it’s a sign that something mattered.

This is where gratitude becomes a bridge.
By acknowledging what was good, what worked, and what we’re thankful for, we give endings the dignity they deserve.

Try this:

“What from this chapter am I grateful for—and what am I ready to release?”

That’s how we begin to metabolize loss instead of carrying it forward as resentment or exhaustion.

The Neutral Zone: Sitting in the In-Between

Then comes what Bridges calls the Neutral Zone—a liminal space where the old is gone, but the new isn’t yet clear.

It’s disorienting. Teams are rebuilding trust. Leaders are redefining roles. Energy fluctuates between hope and fatigue.

This is also the zone where growth starts quietly taking root.

In my coaching practice, I often see clients wanting to “get through” this period as quickly as possible. But this middle zone is fertile ground—it’s where reflection, creativity, and reconnection emerge… if we allow it. We need to talk about it.

New Beginnings: Stepping into What’s Next

Eventually, we cross into the New Beginning zone—the light returns.

The team has adjusted. Roles are clearer. There’s new energy, and perhaps even excitement. But if we skipped over grief and gratitude earlier, the foundation here will be fragile.

True growth comes from integrating what we’ve learned through both the loss and the pause.
It’s in the reflection, the tending, the noticing of how far we’ve come.

Leadership transitions done well aren’t about speed—they’re about wholeness.
They honour what was, nurture what is, and make space for what’s emerging.

This Nurturing November

Maybe this month, instead of only making a gratitude list, we could make a Grief & Gratitude Inventory.
What are you releasing?
What are you thankful for?
What might be quietly growing beneath the surface?

When we lead from this place, we move beyond managing change—we become stewards of meaning.

Because every ending deserves gratitude.
Every neutral zone deserves patience.
And every new beginning deserves to be entered with grace and a clear ground.

Reflection prompts for you and your team:

    • What am I, are we, grieving in this current transition—personally or organizationally?
    • What am I, are we, grateful for that still sustains me/us?
    • What growth might be waiting on the other side of this neutral zone?

Closing thought:

“Transitions are the crucibles of leadership. How we move through them shapes not just what we do next, but who we become.”

If this theme resonates, you might enjoy exploring previous reflections on leadership, loss, and renewal in the Den archives.
Why Ending Well Matters More Than We Think
Leading With What Lights You Up

Looking for support through a current leadership transition?  Let’s talk.

You May also Like

Leadership Power Shift: Why Influence Matters More Than Control in Modern Leadership

Leadership Power Shift: Why Influence Matters More Than Control in Modern Leadership

The way leadership is practiced is changing in modern organizations. Traditional power—rooted in hierarchy, control, and positional authority—was once the dominant force in organizational life.

But the modern leadership landscape has evolved. Complexity, hybrid work, diverse values, and rapid change have rendered command-and-control leadership not just outdated, but increasingly ineffective and exhausting.

This shift from control to influence is redefining what effective leadership looks like today.

Leadership vs Management: Why Organizations Still Produce Managers Instead of Leaders

Leadership vs Management: Why Organizations Still Produce Managers Instead of Leaders

What if the problem isn’t our managers… and isn’t even our senior leaders or CEOs?

Lately I’ve been wanting to write about the difference between leadership and management.

Not from theory.
From what I keep seeing in real organizations.

This isn’t just a conversation about leadership vs management—it’s about how organizational systems shape behaviour.

In coaching conversations with senior leaders & CEOs, the same frustration comes up again and again:

“The managers need to lead more.”
“They stay too operational.”
“They don’t think strategically.”
“They won’t take ownership.”
“They keep bringing problems instead of solving them.”

Every Day Is a Gift

Every Day Is a Gift

March 15th was my birthday.

And March 15th, I lost my best friend.

There is something surreal about holding those two truths at the same time. One day marked by celebration, another marked by loss. One reminding me that I am still here, another reminding me that she is not.

If you have read my writing before, you know I often talk about how we live in paradox. Life is rarely either/or. It is almost always both/and. We can feel joy and grief in the same moment. We can feel gratitude and heartbreak at the same time. We can be celebrating one life while mourning another.

This is that.

This birthday was the clearest example I have ever lived of the paradoxes I so often write about. The day I celebrate my life is now the day I will always remember hers.

Malcare WordPress Security